Annie in wonderland

  In the realm of disability discourse, language is a powerful tool that shapes perceptions and attitudes towards individuals with diverse abilities. Among the myriad of terms used to describe different aspects of disability, adjectives like "lower functioning," "higher functioning," and "behaviours of concern" have been subject to debate and scrutiny. However, there's a growing understanding that these adjectives serve a purpose in effectively communicating the unique experiences and support needs of individuals with disabilities. Rather than shying away from these terms, it's time to acknowledge their value and promote a more nuanced understanding of disability. First and foremost, it's essential to recognize that adjectives such as "lower functioning" and "higher functioning" are not inherently derogatory or demeaning. Instead, they are descriptive terms that provide important context about an individual's level of fu

  In today's world, where discussions around disability and cultural differences are increasingly prevalent, the significance of language cannot be overstated. Words carry weight, shaping perceptions and attitudes towards individuals with disabilities. However, amidst this discourse, there's a growing concern about the policing of language by those who may lack real lived experience of disability. It's essential to navigate this terrain with compassion, understanding, and a genuine commitment to inclusivity. In Australia, terms like "higher functioning" and "lower functioning" are commonly used to describe individuals with disabilities. While these terms may be deemed acceptable within certain contexts, it's crucial to recognize the diversity and complexity of disability experiences. What might be acceptable to some may be offensive or reductive to others. As such, sensitivity and respect must guide our language choices. Moreover, beyond mere semanti